A majority of UK desk workers are operating without clear guidance on artificial intelligence at work, with new research indicating the gap is affecting hiring decisions, productivity, and data oversight. A survey of 200 full-time office and administrative workers by Red Eagle Tech found that 54.5% do not have a clear, enabling policy from their employer on how to use AI tools. Within that group, 41% said AI has never been formally addressed or is discussed only through informal conversations.
The findings point to what the firm describes as an “AI permission gap,” where employees are familiar with AI in their personal lives yet remain unsure about its use in the workplace. They argue that the issue lies with leadership decisions rather than employee capability.
Related: Arun Kar’s journey from Davos to Oxford merges innovation policy purpose
How policies — or their absence — influence hiring
The research highlights a link between AI policies and recruitment.
Some 66.5% of respondents said a prospective employer’s approach to AI tools would influence whether they accept a job offer. A total of 25.5% described it as a major factor, stating they’d favor organizations that provide approved tools and avoid those that restrict access. That suggests companies without clear rules may struggle to attract talent, especially among workers who see AI as a standard part of modern office work. Unapproved use of AI tools remains widespread. Across all respondents, 32% admitted using consumer AI tools for work tasks without employer knowledge. Among organizations with strict bans, usage remains similar at 33.3%, suggesting restrictions do not reduce adoption.
When approved tools fall short
Even in workplaces with clear policies, 33% of employees reported using unapproved tools, a pattern the study attributes to limitations in generic corporate AI systems that don’t connect with existing databases or workflows. The report also found that when approved tools require manual processes such as exporting and copying data, workers often revert to external tools that integrate more easily with their daily work.
Related: Why Offer Relevant Life Insurance As An Employee Benefit
The absence of clear guidance appears to divide behavior among staff. The survey estimates that around 30% of employees in organizations without policies turn to unapproved tools to improve efficiency. The remaining 70% avoid AI altogether, leaving them reliant on manual processes.
That split creates uneven outcomes within teams.
Kat Korson, director at the company, said the lack of direction gives rise to a situation where employees willing to take risks continue using AI tools without oversight, while more cautious staff miss out on productivity gains.
Related: Worst branding mistakes to make in 2023
Responses from workers reflect contrasting experiences.
Some in organizations without clear policies reported concern about job security and uncertainty over acceptable use. Others in workplaces with defined rules described time savings in tasks such as data entry and reported higher productivity when using AI tools. The firm recommends that employers introduce formal AI policies, consult staff on how tools could support their work, and adopt systems that integrate with existing business software. The report doesn’t suggest a one-size-fits-all rule, but it argues that silence from leadership is the worst option. The research was conducted in February 2026 using the Pollfish platform and focused on desk-based workers across the United Kingdom. Red Eagle Tech, a managed service provider, published the findings alongside a free AI policy template on its website.